Friday, September 23, 2011

Does Rolls Royce make any comment on its engine found at the Pentagon after 911, thus proving it was a plane?

That info would certainly shut the conspiricy theorists up.|||Why would Rolls Royce feel the need to make comment on an engine found in the wreckage of a terrorist atrocity? Would you also require comment from the suppliers of the in-flight catering, the producers of in-flight entertainment features or the manufacturers of the seat upholstery? They were all found in the aftermath of the attack so why should they be any different?|||Debris from the plane can clearly be seen in multiple images. A Pentagon security camera picked up images of the plane impacting the building. Remains of all but one of the passengers and crew of the plane were identified by the Air Force and the flight's 'black box' was found on the scene. Multiple eye witness reports state to have seen an airplane impact the building.


Yes, the Pentagon was hit by a Boeing 757-223 jetliner on the morning of September 11, 2001.





I myself have never heard any mention about any comments made by Rolls Royce in regards to their engines and 9/11...that is rather interesting and I wonder have they ever have said anything.











Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_the_plane_鈥?/a>|||There is no shutting up conspiracy theorists. If you point out any proof that contradicts their belief, they accuse that proof as being doctored. And if the source denies it being doctored, then that's denial and they claim is more proof for their side that it's a conspiracy.





It's usually just best to ignore these people. They won't go away, but at least you will not get frustrated trying to get them to understand common sense and logical reasoning.|||Uh, er, it was really delivered to an Air Force general's office for his inspection. Yeah, that's the ticket!

No comments:

Post a Comment